Originality
Demonstrate creativity through a new concept, analytical technique, experimental approach, engineering application, method, or technical contribution to the field.
Develop a high-quality technical paper that clearly communicates the originality, significance, and impact of your work. These standards summarize the primary criteria reviewers use when evaluating papers.
Reviewers consider the technical contribution, development, presentation, and readability of the submitted work.
Demonstrate creativity through a new concept, analytical technique, experimental approach, engineering application, method, or technical contribution to the field.
Explain why the work was undertaken and clearly establish its importance, value, and relevance to the applicable technical field.
Present a unified and fully developed technical study with connected objectives, methods, results, interpretation, and conclusions.
Recognize relevant prior work through accurate references that show how the current contribution relates to established research and technical knowledge.
Arrange the paper in a carefully planned and logical structure so readers can readily understand the problem, approach, results, and conclusions.
Use precise writing, effective sentence structure, accurate equations, and readable tables, graphs, figures, and illustrations to communicate technical ideas.
Use this checklist to review the structure and presentation of your paper before submission.
Use a brief and descriptive title.
Provide a clear indication of the objective, scope, and results.
Present the purpose, problem, approach, results, and conclusions in a logical sequence.
Use recommended symbols, define notation adequately, and apply SI units.
Include accurate, relevant references in the appropriate paper format.
Provide clear drawings, graphs, and photographs without unnecessary lines, lettering, or visual clutter.
Keep the paper within the applicable ASME page limit and submission requirements.
Write clearly and professionally for engineers working in the paper’s technical field.
A successful technical paper should make its purpose, contribution, methodology, and results easy for reviewers and readers to understand.
Review the complete paper against each quality criterion. Confirm that the technical contribution is clearly explained and that every section supports the paper’s objectives, results, and conclusions.
Share